Digital twin

Scenario comparison

Ten preset scenarios across cars, EVs, vans and motorcycles, each showing the selected profile and the reasoning layers.

Simulated real-world data being used for demonstration purposes

Scenarios
FL37.1→ 39 PSIFR38.0→ 39 PSIRL41.1→ 43 PSIRR41.7→ 43 PSI

AB12 CDE

2024 Example EV Crossover

Front target

39PSI

Rear target

43PSI

Load profileHEAVY
Load index6.70
Temp allowance0 PSI
JourneyLong journey

Layer 1 - manufacturer profile matched for 2024 Example EV Crossover (Dual Motor).

Layer 2 - wheel/tyre specification 235/50 R19 103W.

Layer 3 - approved heavy load profile selected (load index 6.70).

Layer 4 - tyres cold (17°C): readings comparable with cold specification.

Layer 5 - AiR safety rules: targets clamped inside the manufacturer envelope; no independent override.

Evidence base

Why these scenarios and not others

Each twin scenario isolates a variable that the literature identifies as first-order: axle load, temperature, tyre size, duty cycle and vehicle mass.

Load transfer scenarios

Approved tables change pressure with axle load, and rear pressures typically rise first as occupancy and luggage are added.2025,1981

Temperature scenarios

Gas-law behaviour on absolute pressure gives the measurement offset between a warm and a cold tyre.2006

Heavy-vehicle and EV scenarios

Higher mass and higher tyre load utilisation increase the energy dissipated in the contact patch, which is what abrasion tracks.2008,2020

Handling scenarios

Cornering stiffness and relaxation length move with pressure, so an under-inflated axle changes the vehicle's response, not just its wear.2012,2008

Cited on this page

These are published third-party sources, not AiR simulation. The full bibliography - peer-reviewed papers, reference monographs, government reports, international standards and official statistics - lives in the science lab.

Open the research and full bibliography
/Ten scenarios/Side-by-side logic/Load index/Temperature allowance/Approved envelope/Per-axle targets/Ten scenarios/Side-by-side logic/Load index/Temperature allowance/Approved envelope/Per-axle targets

Digital twin

The same engine, run against every awkward case

The twin exists so the pressure logic can be interrogated rather than trusted. Change the vehicle, the load or the weather and watch the target, the reasoning and the safety clamp move together.

Scenarios modelled

0

Inputs per recommendation

0

Vehicle, occupants, cargo, journey, warm state, ambient, tyre temperature.

Deterministic replays

0%

Seeded simulation, identical output for identical input.

Targets outside the approved envelope

0

Every recommendation begins with the manufacturer table for that vehicle and tyre size. A load index is derived from occupancy and cargo, which selects the light, normal or laden column - never an invented value between them.

A temperature allowance is then applied to the measurement, not to the specification, so a warm tyre is not accidentally left under-inflated once it cools.

  • Load index maps continuous inputs onto discrete approved columns
  • Journey type biases towards the laden column for sustained motorway running
  • Rear axle moves first on most passenger profiles as weight transfers rearwards
  • The final target is clamped to the approved minimum and maximum

Questions

Straight answers

In this demonstration they are representative values held in the simulation engine. In production they would come from a licensed manufacturer data feed with a versioned audit trail.
TPMS warns when a tyre is already dangerously low, typically 25 percent below specification. It does not tell the driver the correct pressure for today's load, and it cannot correct anything.
No. It is seeded, so the same scenario always produces the same starting pressures, faults and results - which is what makes the twin useful for review.