Partner benchmark

One scoreboard, one set of definitions

Every partner group scored on identical edge compute, social impact and carbon metrics, with a public-facing value summary each of them can publish.

Modelled benchmark

Partners benchmarked

0

One retail group, three recovery operators

Verified checks a year

0

Across the modelled deployed estate of all four

Aggregate peak TOPS

0

Sovereign UK inference capacity at the deployed assumption

tCO2e after haircut

0

Avoided emissions estimate, never a credit

Benchmark scores are modelled from identical metric definitions and identical published factors, at the deployed node assumption shown. They are a planning and comparison instrument for partnership discussion, not a measured league table, and no partner has endorsed the figures.

01 The league

Current leader: AA

Points are a weighted composite of six sub-scores. The weighting is published below, so a partner can see exactly which move improves their position.

Grow one estate and watch the table move

Deployment growth applied

+0%

Every partner is scored on identical definitions, so growth in one estate changes only that partner's position. Nothing is weighted in anyone's favour.

#1

AA

Gold node632 pts

The widest patrol footprint in the country turned into the widest tyre safety dataset in the country.

Largest modelled national coverage

Nodes

1,100

Checks a year

1,267,200

Peak TOPS

172,700

tCO2e after haircut

3,249

coverage63
compute19
resilience89
social68
carbon65
awareness92
#2

Green Flag

Silver node412 pts

A network-first operator using edge inference to cut call-outs, fuel burn and premature tyre replacement together.

Best carbon position per node

Nodes

550

Checks a year

633,600

Peak TOPS

86,350

tCO2e after haircut

1,624

coverage32
compute10
resilience86
social34
carbon32
awareness79
#3

Sytner Group

Bronze node263 pts

Every retail bay becomes a compute node that measures, derives and records the tyre condition of the cars it already sees.

Highest checks per node, retail bay density

Nodes

96

Checks a year

207,360

Peak TOPS

26,400

tCO2e after haircut

532

coverage10
compute3
resilience82
social11
carbon11
awareness74

Same metrics, no home advantage

A partner improves their score by deploying, measuring and publishing. There is no other lever.

02 How the score is built

Definitions, weights and ceilings on the table

Six sub-scores, each normalised against a modelled ceiling, then weighted. Nothing hidden, because a benchmark nobody can audit is worth nothing.

Metric definitions
CoverageVerified checks a year against a modelled 2,000,000 check ceiling
ComputeAggregate peak INT8 TOPS against a modelled 900,000 TOPS ceiling
ResilienceShare of deployment able to complete a check with no cellular link
SocialRoadside incidents avoided against a modelled 12,000 incident ceiling
CarbontCO2e after the uncertainty haircut against a modelled 5,000 tonne ceiling
AwarenessPublishable reach and explained-result rate from the same records
Weighting and grades
Coverage22 percent of the composite
Social20 percent
Compute18 percent
Resilience15 percent
Carbon15 percent
Awareness10 percent
BadgesBronze from 320 points, Silver 320, Gold 500, Platinum 700
RefreshRecomputed whenever a deployment assumption changes

03 Public-facing value summary

What each partner can say in public

One paragraph per partner, written to be quotable, with the outcome numbers behind it on the same tab.

Gold node - rank 1

The widest patrol footprint in the country turned into the widest tyre safety dataset in the country.

Tyre health uplift index

+17 pts

Roadside incidents avoided

8,110

KSI exposure reduced

53.2 events

Roadside hours returned

12,976

Recovery miles avoided

218,972

Community safety conversations

519,552

Sub-scores
coverage63
compute19
resilience89
social68
carbon65
awareness92
Open AA programme

04 Next

Where the score goes next

Benchmark scores are modelled from identical metric definitions and identical published factors, at the deployed node assumption shown. They are a planning and comparison instrument for partnership discussion, not a measured league table, and no partner has endorsed the figures.